The big bang theory supposes that there is a zero moment of time where the universe began. The universe as we know it operates by very specific laws of physics. How did these laws come to be defined at the zero moment of time? The universe could just as well have had no gravity, light that travels twice as fast, or any other combination of physics laws. A universe that operates in accordance to the specific laws of physics has to come to be set in motion. Every theory I've seen makes the same mistake of assuming that there were physical laws defining the operation of the universe at the zero moment of time.

I haven't noticed anyone else on the net that has attempted to overrule the big bang theory in precisely the same manner, so I'm claiming credit for the time being. Some statements from members of the Catholic church are similar. If nothing else there is a widespread belief that the big bang theory offers a potential solution to the origin of the universe. I have proof of blog postings on this topic that go back to November 2010.

W. C. Harding